The 2017 Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) International Meeting's call for papers is now open until 22nd February.  Next year's meeting will be held in Berlin from 7th to 11th August 2017. As co-chair of the Paul and Pauline Literature Programme Unit, we welcome papers proposal to be submitted to us. 

There will also be a special session focussing on the city of Philippi with contributions from archaeologists and epigraphers. This session promises to be interesting to those who are keen on the pagan cults of Philippi, Christian inscriptions, and Roman urbanism and architecture.

Scholars and students from the majority world enjoys a special rate to join SBL via the International Cooperation initiative.

​Please visit SBL's website for further information. 

The Society of Biblical Literature announced the venues for International Meeting for 2018 and 2019 in a newsletter dated October 19, 2016.

I am very delighted that in 2019, SBL International Meeting will be held in Asia for the 3rd time. The first ever International Meeting to be held in Asia was hosted by Trinity Theological College, Singapore, in 2005. In this year, the International Meeting was held in Seoul, South Korea. I am looking forward to the International Meeting in India in 2019. I am grateful for the support given to Asian scholars and scholarship and it would be great to network with our colleagues from South Asia in the near future. 

For only the second time, the SBL International Meeting was held in Asia this year from 2-7 July 2016 in Seoul, South Korea (the first International Meeting was held in Singapore in 2005). This year’s meeting was held in conjunction with the biannual meeting of the Society of Asian Biblical Studies (SABS). Both Yonsei University and Methodist Theological University played host to these meetings respectively. 

More than 500 scholars from all over the world participated in this year’s  meeting, and the presence of a significant number of Asian scholars further contributed to the diversity and rich cultural and scholarly exchange. 

As the co-chair of the Paul and Pauline Literature Section of SBL International Meeting, I am particularly pleased to see a number of very interesting papers presented in this year’s meeting. With a total of 20 papers presented, the Paul and Pauline Literature Section was one of the most represented sections in this year’s meeting. The breakdown of the theme/focus of this year’s papers is tabulated in the following table.

A couple of days ago, I received an email from the Society of Biblical Literature (SBL) of which I am a member and also a co-chair of the Paul and Pauline Literature Programme Unit for the International Meeting. The email announces that the Review of Biblical Literature (RBL) would no longer be a free, open access platform, but move to a site behind a paywall.  This move has been implemented almost immediately, and now requires mandatory login with an SBL member ID in order to access the excellent reviews in the website of RBL. In other words, this effectively means that one must now pay to be a member in order to read the invaluable and critical reviews of the most up-to-date scholarly publications in the field of biblical studies. Current subscribers to the RBL newsletter are given a login ID that is valid until 31 March, after which, they must sign up as SBL member in order to enjoy the privilege of accessing the reviews.
 
I am very disappointed and upset with the move taken by SBL. I am not sure if any consultation has been carried to seek the opinions of members, particularly members from the Majority World. Neither am I sure who are the committee members that made this decision. The strange thing is that there is hardly any valid justification mentioned in the email as to why this move is necessary. This ill-conceived decision comes at a time when we are seeking to make our knowledge widely available to the public.
 
Most distressing of all for me is that I find this decision completely ignores the needs of biblical scholars like me in the Majority World. Many of us are operating within a very limited budget when it comes to book acquisition for the library, and reading the reviews in RBL helps us in making wise decision as we attempt to be good stewards in managing our limited resources. Moreover, many of the academic books are priced beyond the means of many institutions and individuals in the Majority World. By limiting RBL to a member-only access, SBL is essentially cutting off a very important source of information for scholars like me in the Majority World that helps us keep ourselves updated in biblical scholarship. Many of us are also unable to attend any of the annual meetings (which I have not been to one as the cost has been very prohibitive and our institutions simply do not have grants or funding for conferences, not to mention the tedious and costly process of applying for a US visa) and international meetings. I am also thinking of many church leaders/pastors who find RBL to be an excellent source of information but are now deprived of any futureaccess.

One may argue that there is reduced membership rate for scholars from the Majority World at US$15 per annum. While this initiative is greatly appreciated, we need to bear in mind that for some parts of the world, US$15 is tantamount to several days of wages. Furthermore, many scholars simply do not have credit cards or banking facilities to make payment for the membership. This is to highlight that the move to restrict access to RBL to members only further causes difficulties and inconveniences to scholars from the Majority World.
 
In the final analysis, those of us who are in the Majority World have now been cut off from a very valuable and important source of scholarly information. How will this move help SBL achieve its mission of fostering biblical scholarship particularly for scholars in the Majority World? Perhaps one way forward is to allow free access to RBL for scholars from the Majority World, not unlike what has already been practised for the online books currently available under the ICI initiative. I urge all scholars in the Majority World to make your voice count now, and appeal to SBL to reverse this unwise move.